← Back to review Load another dataset
Review renewal economics for Basecamp Ben
Basecamp Ben · influencer · Macro
INVESTIGATE

WHY THIS MATTERS

Basecamp Ben's campaign economics have been consistently weak across multiple campaigns.

WHAT'S HAPPENING

2 campaigns generated approximately $42K in attributed revenue against $24K in fees, indicating limited return.

WHAT SHOULD I DO?

Investigate the flagged pattern for Basecamp Ben before taking action.

WHAT WE OBSERVED

Campaign count
2
Total creator fees
$24,000
Total attributed revenue
$41,970

WHAT WE CALCULATED

Average ROAS
1.8x
Maximum ROAS
1.8x

PERFORMANCE DRIVERS

Primary pattern: ● TRAFFIC LED
Supporting evidence:
Engagement
7.5%
Link clicks
5050
Click-to-redemption
4.1%
Avg ROAS
1.7x
Consistency
Strong
Interpretation:

"Performance appears driven by strong click-through from content."

Descriptive analysis. Does not establish causality.

EVIDENCE VIEWS

WHAT THIS MAY MEAN

avg_roas: 1.75; max_roas: 1.82

Inference confidence: HIGH

CONFIDENCE

Evidence strength
HIGH
Inference confidence
HIGH

CAMPAIGN HISTORY · 2 CAMPAIGNS

2 campaigns · 1.7x–1.8x ROAS

4x 1.8x 25-10 1.7x 26-04

Performance is not dependent on a single campaign.

View campaign details
Period ROAS Revenue Fee Engagement
2025-10 1.8x $21,830 $12,000 7.5%
2026-04 1.7x $20,140 $12,000 7.4%

CAVEATS

  • Review renewal economics and determine next steps

TRUST STATUS

✓ Evidence checked · AI interpretation validated

More about trust verification

Evidence available · Policy validation active · Unsupported claims blocked

Reason Codes

REPEATED_POOR_ECONOMICS · MULTIPLE_WEAK_CAMPAIGNS

Demo environment · decisions are not persisted

HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THIS RECOMMENDATION?

Recommendations are decision support. They do not establish causality or incrementality unless supported by appropriate evidence.
Advanced Demo Settings